In America it apparently is worse to shoot yourself in the leg than it is to drive drunk and kill a human being or kill numerous dogs. That was the message given by the U.S. courts today when they sentenced former New York Giants Wide Receiver Plaxico Burress to two years behind bars… Or 23 months more than Donte Stallworth got for killing someone with his car, and four months more than Michael Vick served for his sickening acts of killing numerous dogs (although Burress could get out in 20 months for good behavior).
Chest bump to the legal system!
This doesn’t make sense on so many levels.
Does a man that accidentally shoots himself in the leg actually deserve two years in jail? No, I’m not a big fan of Plaxico Burress and for all the dumb, irresponsible things he’s done in his career he probably deserves an extreme punishment… but I think a two year prison sentence is a little much. Especially when you compare it to the other two incidents mentioned above! If you followed the same rule in this case as you did in those, Burress should get off with community service for god sakes.
Now, you can’t go around with a unlicensed gun in your pocket and he does deserve some kind of reprimand. But please explain to me how a guy that inflicts pain on himself accidentally should get harsher punishment than those that inflicted pain and death on others?
Bravo legal system. Bravo!
Posts Tagged ‘Michael Vick’
The process of making New Years resolutions dates back to the Babylonians. The most popular resolution at that time was to return any borrowed farm equipment to its rightful owners. Although returning borrowed farm equipment should be high on our priority list there is often more pressing needs in our life.
In today’s society we tend to make New Years resolutions that require tremendous amounts of self discipline such as losing weight, quitting smoking and/or drinking, starting an exercise program, or vowing to never again kick the neighbors dog.
The fact is that you should quit smoking because breathing is a good thing. We should start exercising because it is important to be healthy. And we should not kick the neighbor’s dog because it is not nice and you might end up in a cell next to Michael Vick.
Perhaps instead we should make resolutions that should be easy and perhaps even fun. We could take measures to reduce our stress. Let’s force ourselves to have fun and enjoy life. Life is short. Trite but true. It is not all that serious.
I have multiple New Years resolutions this year. I will see Jimmy Buffet this year. I am required to see one theatrical play. I will go out at least one night and spend a stupid amount of money on a steak for no other reason than it is nice to treat yourself once in a while. I will attend three major sporting events, college or professional. There will be at least one long weekend and one week long trip because you need some down time to recharge your batteries. I vow to explore and visit places locally that I have never been.
Last but not least, I will take every available opportunity to let my family know how much I love them and how important they are in my life.
I think it may be a mistake to always focus on what we should not be doing instead of taking a look at what we should be doing.
Here’s to a fantastic year.
Love him or hate him, Michael Vick was one of the premier players in the National Football League prior to his felony convictions stemming from an illegal dog fighting ring. As part of his punishment, Vick was suspended indefinitely by the NFL prior to serving a year and a half long prison term. Recently, league commissioner Roger Goodell announced that he will allow Michael to return no later than 6 games into the regular season. He will still be able to practice and participate in preseason activities.
Despite this news, Vick still has to find a team that is willing to sign him. Although he hasn’t received any offers yet, the rumor mills have been working overtime. Some NFL insiders have said that a number of teams are showing interest in Vick. Most analysts say that whoever signs him will do so under the radar in an attempt to dodge the spotlight, but that is going to be impossible.
Everyone has an opinion on the Vick situation. While many people believe he has served his time and handled his punishment, there are others that think he will never be able to attain the status he once had. During the peak of his football career, Vick was rolling in endorsements and undisputed fame. He was able to acquire a number of properties throughout the United States and invest in any business venture that piqued his interest. After his conviction, Vick lost millions of dollars in wages and endorsement deals. He was forced to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy while serving his prison term.
I think he will find it difficult to land a new contract. After all Vick has done to tarnish his image, any team that takes him on will be inviting scrutiny and controversy. Analysts have agreed that his new team will undoubtedly face a public relations nightmare and may also see protesters marching outside their stadium. We’re in a severely unstable economic climate. There isn’t a single team in the NFL that can afford a potential controversy of epic proportions that could lead to a loss of revenue. Teams will definitely have to weigh the benefits of bringing in Vick versus the possible ramifications his contract would bring.
With the amount of debt he is facing, Vick needs to find a way to make ends meet and make good on his financial obligations. Unfortunately, I am not entirely certain he is going to be able to hide from his reputation and reclaim his status as a successful player in the NFL.
Issues on animal cruelty in the United States came to the forefront of American media when football superstar Michael Vick was indicted on charges of funding and operating an underground dog fighting ring in his spare time. He reportedly trained the dogs using harsh punishment techniques, even killing dogs that didn’t perform well enough. In the wake of such an emotionally supercharged topic, one must ask the question of how our animal cruelty laws are enforced, not to mention the ethical principles guiding legal valuations.
First, let us understand animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is characterized as applying unusually harsh forms of punishment imposed on animals for either no reason, or pure entertainment. The impetus for animal cruelty behavior among humans is highly debated. However, psychology has shown that high occurrences of animal cruelty during childhood are an indication of future psychopathic and sociopathic behavior.
Even more sensitive is the ethical valuations of different forms of animal cruelty. The debate is centered on whether or not animal have the same sense of being and also if their existence warrants a certain set of “unalienable” rights (if you will). Anthropomorphic sentiments are often attached to these debates, citing that one should protect these animals’ dignity and honor. Organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) go so far as to promote vegetarianism, expose bad meat-processing techniques, and prosecute other organizations that overstep what some consider to be inhumane killing processes.
The large issue of whether or not killing animals is okay will unfortunately never be resolved. Big money businesses have generated huge profits from killing animals in order to supply the ever-growing fresh meat market. And while killing these animals seems to be permissible, there is an undefined threshold at which the treatment of animals goes from being right to being wrong.
Because the line is not defined, translating this threshold into a legal structure becomes extremely difficult. Questions like ‘What exactly connotes cruelty?’ and ‘What is unnecessary?’ come to the forefront of the debate. Subjective valuations get thrown around until something is actually agreed upon by the majority, usually stemming from an emotional tolerance level which varies across any given population.
We may never know what actually is right or wrong in any given situation, partially because it isn’t a matter of fact; it’s a matter of feeling. And since these varying emotional sentiments that permeate into reality are far from static, our perception of reality is skewed with bias. Michael Vick was convicted on the grounds that his activities were illegal. Whether or not it was right or wrong, we may never decide.
Incoming search terms for the article:
“Even more sensitive is the ethical valuations of different forms of animal cruelty The debate is centered on whether or not animal have the same sense of being and also if their existence warrants a certain set of unalienable rights (if you will) Anthrop
Football fans have been buzzing with the release of new Michael Vick Philadelphia Eagles jerseys. After his release from prison and subsequent reinstatement to the NFL, there were rumors about which team he would end up signing with. It’s easy to say that nobody thought he would end up on the Philadelphia Eagles, a team with an entrenched, Pro Bowl quarterback at the helm in Donovan McNabb.
This is a Catch-22; in attempting to raise awareness on animal abuse issues, animal advocacy groups, the law officials and concerned citizens publicize the details of horrific animal abuse crimes but in our efforts to raise awareness are we actually helping to perpetrate more crimes?
Take the Michael Vick case, a high profile, celebrity, animal cruelty, dog fighting case. It has been publicized to the point that people who never heard of Michael Vick now know who he is and what he’s done. People who never knew the horrors of dog fighting have gotten an education they never anticipated or expected. Now look in the news; story after story on dog fighting. I’m not talking about the large dog fighting rings that have been uncovered because public awareness has been raised, that’s a big positive! What I am talking about are the stories that are surfacing of kids on street corners and alleys and backyards, fighting dogs, 12 and 15 yr olds being arrested. Has this been happening all along or can some of this be attributed to these children emulating a ‘sport’s hero’ and all of the publicity surrounding the story?
What about the dog burnings? There have been two relatively recent, high profile, highly publicized cases involving dogs being doused with an accelerant and set on fire; the DeShawn Brown case in which Mercy, a 10 month old pit bull, was stabbed and set on fire and the Derick Phanord case in which another pit bull, dubbed Maximus, was doused and set on fire, both dogs eventually died due to their injuries. Now we are hearing this happening more and more. Juan Daniels, 20, was arrested in Alabama for ‘allegedly’ beating his family’s dog then setting him on fire after being denied the use of the family car. There’s been a rash of dog burnings in Atlanta, almost a dozen. Originally officials thought this might be attributed to gang activity but now they just don’t know. There have been several other cases as well where dogs were set on fire or had some caustic substance poured on them and no one was ever caught or arrested.
After hearing more and more stories like this I begin to question, in the attempt to raise awareness of animal abuse issues, are these highly publicized accounts actually perpetuating the violence. Are there sick and twisted individuals out there reading these stories and getting their kicks, and getting ideas?
Everyone’s heard of copycat crimes. Someone hears about something someone else has done and for one sick reason or another, they are intrigued or excited and figure they’ll do the same thing themselves. Is this happening with many of these horrific animal abuse crimes or would the people who are doing these things be doing them anyway?
And what about scenes in movies portraying animal abuse and other abuses; do these lead to emulations and copycat crimes?
To be quite honest, in all the research I’ve done, the results are disappointingly inconclusive, one way or another. There’s a great deal of talk and discussion and opinions, but no real evidence to prove or disprove. One of the problems is the lack of a central database on animal abuse, even the FBI does not separately categorize animal abuse crimes, and the lack of reporting of animal abuse. Often this can be attributed to the fact that so many people regard animals as ‘just a dog’ or ‘just a cat’ and give its life very little worth. And as much as animal advocates try to publicize to raise the awareness of the heinousness of animal abuse, there are others that trivialize it, often the very system that advocates are working to show that changes need to come, the legal and judicial system.
They trivialize by not charging abusers, by dismissing charges and by giving such lenient sentences that it sends a message out that ‘it’s no big deal.’ You see such cases and sentences publicized all the time and it doesn’t take a genius to understand the message this sends.
At this point, since there are no hard statistical analyses to back up any hard conclusions, just based on research of what is available I’m going to put forth some hypothesis of what I believe.
FACT — Available animal abuse statistics show a steady rise in animal abuse cases.
HYPOTHESIS — It is impossible to conclude from statistics whether animal abuse is on the rise or, due to increased awareness, reporting is on the rise. There is no doubt that animal advocacy has raised the awareness of these crimes, especially with the finally acknowledged link between animal abuse and other forms of violence.
FACT — There is a spike in ‘like crimes’ reported in the media and to law enforcement after a highly publicized animal abuse crime.
HYPOTHESIS — I believe this is due to dual reasons; the increased awareness in the particular crime makes people more sensitive to it and more apt to report it if they have knowledge of it, and I do believe there is some emulation of the crime. How much to attribute to either cause is debatable and I think depends on the crime itself as well as many other factors.
A person who may have once kicked or lashed out at the family dog in anger may now drag that same dog out, beat it and set it on fire because that image is locked in their subconscious.
In conclusion I believe that as a society we are more desensitized to crime, against people and animals because of the images we are faced with every day; in the news, in movies, on TV. I think there is more of a potential for copycat crimes because of publicity.
In regard to animal abuse, does the publicity perpetuate more animal abuse? I guess my final thoughts on this are that it may perpetuate ‘like crimes’ but the people doing these things are people who were most likely going to be doing ‘something’ anyway, whether now or later. Your normal, average person who does not have these tendencies is not going to all of the sudden decide they are going to get a thrill out of hurting, abusing or killing an animal just because they heard someone else doing it. It is going to be someone who is already morally and empathically deficit, someone who, one way or another, is already on that road.
Is it worth taking the chance? Due to the acknowledged link between animal abuse and interpersonal crimes, and the general leniency of animal abuse laws, I believe it is necessary to, within reasonable limits, do whatever we can to raise public awareness of the heinousness of the crime of animal abuse so that people demand stronger laws and sentences in these cases. Very often, animal abuse is the first step toward even more vicious crimes and at other times it is perpetrated in conjunction with other crimes; child abuse, spousal abuse, etc. If we can raise awareness to animal abuse and make our officials take notice and take action, we may be able to stave off future violence.
It is official; Michael Vick is done with the rest of the NFL season. After deferring to his attorneys, the NFL quarterback has decided to accept a plea deal regarding the dog fighting operation. Vick will be spending at least ten months in jail for his actions. It was fairly obvious that Vick was headed to prison after a significant amount of incriminating evidence was found against him.
The defense attorney (Lawrence Woodward) for Michael Vick stated, “Mike’s accepting full responsibility. He’s going to do everything he can personally and professionally to make this situation right.” Another one of Michael’s lawyers (Billy Martin) went on to say, “After consulting with his family over the weekend, Michael Vick asks that I announce today that he has reached an agreement with federal prosecutors regarding the charges pending against him. Mr. Vick has agreed to enter a plea of guilty to those charges and to accept full responsibility for his action and the mistakes he has made. Michael wishes to apologize again to everyone who has been hurt by this matter.” The Atlanta Falcons invested $ 130 million in Michael Vick, but it has come to no avail. Fortunately, the Falcons will be able to reclaim at least $ 22 million of that $ 130 million contract. To make matters worse, Vick will not be able to play in the NFL until the 2010 football season. More likely than not, the pro bowl quarterback will be waived from the Atlanta Falcons after serving time in jail.
Ticket sales will drastically plummet because Michael Vick was the box office attraction; moreover, he was the guy who filled the Georgia Dome with fans. The Michael Vick fiasco is like watching an episode of Cops. In virtually every episode of Cops, the criminal always denies that the drugs in the truck are his/hers. Furthermore, the criminals shrugs their shoulders and says “I don’t know how those drugs got there” or “those drugs aren’t mine” or “I was set up.” In reality, the criminals always know how the drugs got there because they put them there. Similarly, Michael Vick is doing the same thing. The only difference is instead of drugs, Vick is using dogs. Initially, Michael denied he had anything to do with this transgression.
In reality, Mr. Vick knew how the dog killing equipment was at his property because he put them there. It appears that Michael Vick will not be barking out audibles at the line of scrimmage this NFL season (get it, I came up with that one all by myself). The old saying “if you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime” is in full effect here. For violating the NFL conduct policy, Michael Vick will be violated in prison (unless he sent to a jail with cellmates that have erectile dysfunction). With or without Michael Vick, the Atlanta Falcons are already mathematically eliminated from the playoffs.
2007 was a year with the usual dose of sporting scandals, involving the biggest names in the sport. 2008 doesn’t promise to be much better, with the first story only taking a week to break…
Jan 2008, and Marion Jones is sentenced to 6 months prison over her drug case.
She wasn’t jailed for the drug offences, but because she lied to federal investigators over the investigation. At her sentencing she pleaded with the judge to be ‘humane’ as she is the mother of 2 children. Come on Marion! Presumably you thought of your children when you set the example of lying to federal agents did you?
It’s a scandal to carry on in the nature of 2007 – big names who set seemingly great examples, not only taken to task about cheating, but lying about it to try and get away with it.
The Formula 1 motor racing team McLaren were caught receiving information about their rival’s car specifications. When confronted they denied it vigorously, before admitting it.
The New England Patriots American football team were caught filming their opponents to try and work out their tactics – vehement denials followed by sheepish admission.
Michael Vick was accused of being involved with dog fighting. Vehement denials followed by eventual admission.
Needless to say the Tour de France cycle race was riddled with drug failures as it seems to be every year.
The press are sometimes accused of being sensationalist, and for sure they are not slow to pounce on the meerest hint of scandal and explode it, but in all these cases, I think the publicity has been justified.
In all the cases, the press has been used to build the careers of the individuals and organisations, and in their privilidged positions, we are more than entitled to know when they cheat.
Cheating in sport lets everyone down, because in society it’s important for the health and mind lessons in teaches.
It would be nice to think that Marion Jones is the last case of 2008, but let’s face it, with it being an Olympic year, there are undoubtedly more scandals around the corner.
Sutton Coldfield – West Midlands, UK is considered as the Shopper’s delight. It is a stop on the London and North Western Railway line. The old name is Sutton Colville. The High Street, Mill Street and Coleshill Street belongs to the High conservation area.
It was given the tile of Royal Town in 1974. The train station is in the center of town and it is well connected by buses. There is a golf course. There is a catholic school, primary school and also a college here. It is a very traditional historic town filled with heritage and antiques.
This town in the City of Birmingham is eight miles from the center of Birmingham. For less than four pounds you can watch a movie at the cinema. The Mall is the main shopping center. The town is located on one of the branches of River Tame.
The House of Frazer is a great place to shop clothes, handbag and kitchen stuff. There are also cafes here. Children enjoy the Kingsbury Water Park which has many of sports and activities. If you love arts and craft head to the Mitchell Centre.
Sutton has been home to many popular people: Scott Adkins, Actor; Emma Griffiths, model; Mike Jordan, racing driver; Michael Vick, football player and many others. Saturday is the busiest day in town. Vesvey Memorial Gardens are a great attraction.
The Parade in the town centre is the hub for the buses operating around. The Sutton Coldfield Library is located in the town centre. There are many religious buildings such as the Holy Trinity Church, Church of All Saints, Four Oaks Methodist Church, Church of St Peter and St John’s Church.
Most of the old mansions and manors have been now turned into luxurious hotels. It has the largest urban park in the country.









